EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQCC.TO (Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF) and BRKY.NEO (Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while BRKY.NEO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EQCC.TO returned 25.89% vs -5.33% for BRKY.NEO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQCC.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BRKY.NEO.

Performance

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than BRKY.NEO's -6.22% return.

EQCC.TO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 10.59%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKY.NEO

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 2.72%
• YTD: -6.22%
• 6M: -5.94%
• 1Y: -5.33%
• 3Y*: 14.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF	10.59%	13.50%	11.68%
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF	-6.22%	9.35%	18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EQCC.TO and BRKY.NEO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2024	0.13

Return for Risk

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCC.TO

EQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

BRKY.NEO

BRKY.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BRKY.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BRKY.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BRKY.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BRKY.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BRKY.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQCC.TO	BRKY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	-0.35	+2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	-0.39	+3.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	0.95	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	-0.51	+4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	-1.07	+15.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the BRKY.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCC.TO and BRKY.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQCC.TO	BRKY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	-0.35	+2.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.86	+0.46

Drawdowns

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, smaller than the maximum BRKY.NEO drawdown of -17.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and BRKY.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQCC.TO	BRKY.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.94%	-17.43%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.32%	-10.55%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-15.05%	+13.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-5.63%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	5.00%	-3.14%

Volatility

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) at 3.54%. This indicates that EQCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKY.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQCC.TO	BRKY.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	3.54%	+3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	11.60%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	15.23%	-3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.99%	17.77%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.99%	17.77%	-3.78%

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKY.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQCC.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, more than BRKY.NEO's 7.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF	7.55%	5.58%	11.30%	5.40%	0.49%
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF	8.86%	9.43%	5.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQCC.TO and BRKY.NEO in my portfolio?

EQCC.TO and BRKY.NEO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQCC.TO or BRKY.NEO?

On fees, BRKY.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQCC.TO or BRKY.NEO?

BRKY.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EQCC.TO.

What is the main difference between EQCC.TO and BRKY.NEO?

EQCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while BRKY.NEO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EQCC.TO and 0.40% for BRKY.NEO.