PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQAC.MI vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQAC.MI is traded in EUR, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EQAC.MI having a 20.38% return and SCHD slightly higher at 20.43%.


EQAC.MI

1D
-0.78%
1M
9.28%
YTD
20.38%
6M
19.41%
1Y
37.86%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.89%
YTD
20.43%
6M
19.23%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EQAC.MI
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
20.38%6.78%35.08%50.29%-30.28%40.00%35.43%6.99%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
21.18%-8.04%19.03%1.41%2.74%39.59%5.55%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAC.MI and SCHD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019

0.22

The correlation between EQAC.MI and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAC.MI
EQAC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EQAC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQAC.MISCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

6.24

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

14.97

-3.65

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAC.MI Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAC.MI and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQAC.MISCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.22

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.65

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.88

+0.17

Drawdowns

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAC.MI drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAC.MI and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQAC.MISCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-32.28%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-4.15%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.69%

-21.40%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-21.40%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.46%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-4.43%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.73%

+1.61%

Volatility

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that EQAC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQAC.MISCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

2.99%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

8.53%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

11.74%

+3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

14.60%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

17.44%

+3.79%

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAC.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQAC.MI vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

EQAC.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQAC.MI
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQAC.MI and SCHD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQAC.MI.

EQAC.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. EQAC.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQAC.MI and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQAC.MI and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer