EPV vs. SSO
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPV returned -22.82%/yr vs 23.26%/yr for SSO. Their -0.77 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
EPV vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -19.77% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 19.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EPV has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -22.82%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.26% annualized return.
EPV
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -19.77%
- 1Y
- -35.04%
- 3Y*
- -26.13%
- 5Y*
- -19.02%
- 10Y*
- -22.82%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.54%
SSO
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 15.55%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 1Y
- 41.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.95%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- 23.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $306.03K | $269.56K | $428.32K | |
| $185.74M | $192.80M | $223.12M |
EPV vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -19.77% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -31.62% | -37.31% | -36.11% | 32.22% | -39.79% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.52% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and SSO is -0.73, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2009 | -0.77 |
The correlation between EPV and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.77 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
SSO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPV
SSO
Basic Materials
EPV
-
SSO
Communication Services
EPV
-
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
SSO
Energy
EPV
-
SSO
Healthcare
EPV
-
SSO
Industrials
EPV
-
SSO
Real Estate
EPV
-
SSO
Technology
EPV
-
SSO
Utilities
EPV
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
SSO
EPV vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.28 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.05 | 2.29 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | 9.14 | -10.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -84.67% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.55% | -18.17% | -15.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.49% | -35.21% | -32.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.42% | -46.73% | -33.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.02% | -59.34% | -33.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.41% | -1.28% | -98.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.47% | -19.44% | -69.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.92% | 4.53% | +17.39% |
Volatility
EPV vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 7.63%. This indicates that EPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 7.63% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.44% | 20.31% | +8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.47% | 25.58% | +6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 33.91% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 35.93% | +0.97% |
EPV vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPV vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than SSO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.98% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.66% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and SSO have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPV has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to SSO (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.41% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.26% vs -22.82% for EPV. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 7.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.26% return vs -22.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EPV.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.66% for SSO.
EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer