EPV vs. GGLL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while GGLL tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EPV returned -23.66%/yr vs 63.59%/yr for GGLL. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GGLL.

Performance

EPV vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -15.73% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 15.84% return.

EPV

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: -11.43%
• YTD: -15.73%
• 1Y: -28.32%
• 3Y*: -23.66%
• 5Y*: -19.47%
• 10Y*: -22.64%

GGLL

• 1D: -8.96%
• 1M: -11.55%
• 6M: 2.86%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 1Y: 213.08%
• 3Y*: 63.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPV vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	-15.73%	-45.21%	2.02%	-30.81%	-25.07%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	15.84%	123.07%	48.88%	81.20%	-30.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EPV and GGLL is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022	-0.40

The correlation between EPV and GGLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (1 year) to -0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPV vs. GGLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPV	GGLL
Financial Services	44.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EPV vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPV

EPV Risk / Return Rank: 2
EPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GGLL

GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 93
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPV vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPV	GGLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	3.52	-4.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	3.92	-5.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.47	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	5.59	-6.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	16.06	-17.43

EPV vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPV Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPV and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPV vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and GGLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPV	GGLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-52.81%	-46.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.63%	-38.39%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.78%	-52.81%	-13.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.38%	-25.15%	-74.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.44%	-15.36%	-73.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.77%	13.33%	+7.44%

Volatility

EPV vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 7.78%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 21.63%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPV	GGLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.78%	21.63%	-13.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.93%	44.92%	-16.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.14%	60.88%	-28.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.93%	56.45%	-20.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.82%	56.45%	-19.63%

EPV vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPV vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than GGLL's 4.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	4.74%	4.80%	4.83%	3.17%	0.33%	0.01%	0.09%	1.10%	0.19%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	4.25%	4.16%	3.29%	2.05%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPV and GGLL in my portfolio?

EPV and GGLL have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPV or GGLL?

GGLL has higher volatility (21.63%) compared to EPV (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.40% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

Which ETF is better, EPV or GGLL?

On 3-year performance, GGLL leads with 63.59% vs -23.66% for EPV. On fees, EPV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 7.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPV or GGLL?

Over the 3-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 63.59% return vs -23.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPV or GGLL?

EPV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GGLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPV or GGLL?

EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.25% for GGLL.

What is the main difference between EPV and GGLL?

EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.96% for GGLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.