EPV vs. ADBG
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EPV is passively managed, while ADBG is actively managed. Over the past year, EPV returned -27.09% vs -70.05% for ADBG. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ADBG.
Performance
EPV vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -11.73% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -52.94% return.
EPV
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -11.73%
- 6M
- -16.26%
- 1Y
- -27.09%
- 3Y*
- -24.57%
- 5Y*
- -17.86%
- 10Y*
- -22.24%
ADBG
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- -52.94%
- 6M
- -46.73%
- 1Y
- -70.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPV vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -11.73% | -29.65% |
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -52.94% | -30.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and ADBG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
ADBG
EPV vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPV | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.92 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.40 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPV | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | -1.05 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.91 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
EPV vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than ADBG's maximum drawdown of -76.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and ADBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -76.71% | -22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.91% | -76.23% | +44.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -71.42% | -27.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.38% | -41.64% | -46.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.69% | 50.12% | -31.43% |
Volatility
EPV vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 11.72%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) has a volatility of 27.71%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.72% | 27.71% | -15.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.10% | 56.21% | -30.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.19% | 67.26% | -36.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 66.94% | -31.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.80% | 66.94% | -29.14% |
EPV vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPV vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.79% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and ADBG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADBG has higher volatility (27.71%) compared to EPV (11.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.38% vs ADBG's -76.71%.
On 1-year performance, EPV leads with -27.09% vs -70.05% for ADBG. On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 11.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPV has performed better with a -27.09% return vs -70.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EPV.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.75% for ADBG.
EPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and ADBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer