EPU vs. OTGL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - EPU tracks the MSCI All Peru Capped Index while OTGL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EPU returned 81.51% vs 26.35% for OTGL. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OTGL.

Performance

EPU vs. OTGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 20.80% return, which is significantly higher than OTGL's 9.81% return.

EPU

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 0.92%
• YTD: 20.80%
• 1Y: 81.51%
• 3Y*: 42.19%
• 5Y*: 31.75%
• 10Y*: 13.22%
• ALL TIME*: 10.65%

OTGL

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.90%
• 6M: -1.74%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 1Y: 26.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	$5.01M	$4.02M	$5.98M
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	$5.65K	$5.56K	$25.83K

EPU vs. OTGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	20.80%	48.78%
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	9.81%	13.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EPU and OTGL is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.68

The correlation between EPU and OTGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EPU vs. OTGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPU

EPU Risk / Return Rank: 88
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 80

OTGL

OTGL Risk / Return Rank: 54
OTGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
OTGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
OTGL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
OTGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
OTGL Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPU vs. OTGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPU	OTGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.39	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	1.96	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.25	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	1.95	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	5.01	+5.45

EPU vs. OTGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPU Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the OTGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPU and OTGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPU vs. OTGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, which is greater than OTGL's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and OTGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPU	OTGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.62%	-13.52%	-47.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.85%	-13.52%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.86%	-5.37%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-3.78%	-14.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.72%	5.25%	+2.47%

Volatility

EPU vs. OTGL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) at 4.49%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OTGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPU	OTGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.00%	4.49%	+4.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.47%	15.28%	+12.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.03%	18.95%	+13.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	18.77%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.71%	18.77%	+4.94%

EPU vs. OTGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than OTGL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPU vs. OTGL - Dividend Comparison

EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than OTGL's 2.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	1.98%	1.63%	5.78%	4.17%	5.56%	3.13%	1.91%	2.67%	1.53%	3.30%	0.85%	1.90%
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	2.71%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPU and OTGL in my portfolio?

EPU and OTGL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPU or OTGL?

EPU has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to OTGL (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs OTGL's -13.52%.

Which ETF is better, EPU or OTGL?

On 1-year performance, EPU leads with 81.51% vs 26.35% for OTGL. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, OTGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPU or OTGL?

Over the 1-year period, EPU has performed better with a 81.51% return vs 26.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPU or OTGL?

EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPU or OTGL?

OTGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.98% for EPU.

What is the main difference between EPU and OTGL?

EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while OTGL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and OTG. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.95% for OTGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.