EPSV vs. TOAK
EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) and TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPSV returned 46.19% vs 3.70% for TOAK. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. EPSV charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TOAK.
Performance
EPSV vs. TOAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPSV achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than TOAK's 1.32% return.
EPSV
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 6M
- 26.98%
- 1Y
- 46.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPSV vs. TOAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF | 26.42% | 20.91% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 1.32% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPSV and TOAK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPSV vs. TOAK — Risk / Return Rank
EPSV
TOAK
EPSV vs. TOAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPSV | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.77 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 2.05 | +3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.03 | 8.11 | +9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPSV | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.27 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.66 | 1.82 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
EPSV vs. TOAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPSV drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, which is greater than TOAK's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSV and TOAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPSV | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -1.81% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -1.81% | -7.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -1.72% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -0.10% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 0.46% | +2.11% |
Volatility
EPSV vs. TOAK - Volatility Comparison
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) at 2.72%. This indicates that EPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPSV | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 2.72% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 2.89% | +9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 2.92% | +14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 2.22% | +15.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 2.22% | +15.92% |
EPSV vs. TOAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPSV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TOAK's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPSV vs. TOAK - Dividend Comparison
EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.88% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPSV and TOAK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to TOAK (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSV dropped -8.93% vs TOAK's -1.81%.
On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 3.70% for TOAK. On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TOAK has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.
EPSV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.
EPSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while TOAK is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSV and 0.25% for TOAK.
EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPSV and TOAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer