EPSV vs. BILZ
EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EPSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPSV returned 46.19% vs 3.91% for BILZ. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. EPSV charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.
Performance
EPSV vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPSV achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.47% return.
EPSV
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 6M
- 26.98%
- 1Y
- 46.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPSV vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF | 26.42% | 20.91% |
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.47% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPSV and BILZ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPSV vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank
EPSV
BILZ
EPSV vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPSV | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -121.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 53.31 | -51.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 198.55 | -193.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.03 | 2,000.92 | -1,982.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPSV | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 19.09 | -16.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.66 | 10.48 | -7.82 |
Drawdowns
EPSV vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPSV drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSV and BILZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPSV | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -0.52% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -0.02% | -8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -0.01% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 0.00% | +2.57% |
Volatility
EPSV vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that EPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPSV | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 0.07% | +5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 0.14% | +12.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 0.21% | +17.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 0.43% | +17.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 0.43% | +17.71% |
EPSV vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPSV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPSV vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison
EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than BILZ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.07% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% |
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPSV and BILZ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSV dropped -8.93% vs BILZ's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 3.91% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.
BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.28% for EPSV.
EPSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSV and 0.14% for BILZ.
BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.09 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPSV and BILZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer