PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPSV vs. BILZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPSV vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSV achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.47% return.


EPSV

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.26%
YTD
26.42%
6M
26.98%
1Y
46.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILZ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPSV vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EPSV and BILZ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPSV vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPSV
EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPSV vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPSVBILZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-121.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

53.31

-51.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

198.55

-193.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.03

2,000.92

-1,982.89

EPSV vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is lower than the BILZ Sharpe Ratio of 19.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSV and BILZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPSVBILZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

19.09

-16.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.66

10.48

-7.82

Drawdowns

EPSV vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSV drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSV and BILZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSVBILZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-0.52%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-0.02%

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-0.01%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

0.00%

+2.57%

Volatility

EPSV vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison

Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that EPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSVBILZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

0.07%

+5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

0.14%

+12.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

0.21%

+17.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

0.43%

+17.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

0.43%

+17.71%

EPSV vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPSV vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than BILZ's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.07%4.19%4.95%2.23%
EPSV
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
2.28%2.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPSV and BILZ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSV dropped -8.93% vs BILZ's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 3.91% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.28% for EPSV.

EPSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSV and 0.14% for BILZ.

BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.09 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPSV and BILZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer