EPSV vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPSV returned 46.19% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPSV charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

EPSV vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSV achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.

EPSV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 7.26%
• YTD: 26.42%
• 6M: 26.98%
• 1Y: 46.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPSV vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	26.42%	20.91%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EPSV and BAMU is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	0.00

EPSV vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPSV	BAMU
Industrials	24.9%	-
Technology	22.7%	-
Financial Services	19.1%	98.8%
Real Estate	7.5%	-
Energy	6.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.3%	-
Utilities	3.7%	-
Healthcare	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

EPSV vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPSV

EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPSV vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPSV	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	4.98	-2.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	8.77	-5.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	2.41	-0.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.19	24.89	-19.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.03	97.89	-79.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPSV vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSV and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPSV	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	4.98	-2.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.66	4.14	-1.48

Drawdowns

EPSV vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSV drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSV and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPSV	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.93%	-0.36%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-0.12%	-8.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-0.02%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	0.03%	+2.54%

Volatility

EPSV vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that EPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPSV	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	0.07%	+5.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	0.43%	+12.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	0.59%	+17.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.14%	0.87%	+17.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	0.87%	+17.27%

EPSV vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPSV vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	2.28%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPSV and BAMU in my portfolio?

EPSV and BAMU have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPSV or BAMU?

EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSV dropped -8.93% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, EPSV or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, EPSV is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPSV or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPSV or BAMU?

EPSV is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPSV or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.28% for EPSV.

What is the main difference between EPSV and BAMU?

EPSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSV and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.