EPSB vs. HGER

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPSB (Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPSB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. EPSB is actively managed, while HGER is passively managed. Over the past year, EPSB returned 29.37% vs 41.90% for HGER. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. EPSB charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.

Performance

EPSB vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSB achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 28.12% return.

EPSB

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 18.61%
• 6M: 19.57%
• 1Y: 29.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HGER

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -2.72%
• YTD: 28.12%
• 6M: 27.93%
• 1Y: 41.90%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPSB vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	18.61%	13.67%
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	28.12%	13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EPSB and HGER is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	-0.04

EPSB vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPSB	HGER
Industrials	29.9%	-
Technology	22.6%	-
Financial Services	13.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	-
Basic Materials	7.1%	102.4%
Healthcare	6.3%	-
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	3.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

EPSB vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPSB

EPSB Risk / Return Rank: 64
EPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
EPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 66

HGER

HGER Risk / Return Rank: 78
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPSB vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPSB	HGER	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.50	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.23	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.46	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	5.20	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	17.52	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPSB vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSB and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPSB	HGER	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.50	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.08	0.90	+1.18

Drawdowns

EPSB vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSB drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum HGER drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSB and HGER.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPSB	HGER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.46%	-23.31%	+14.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.46%	-8.09%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-4.99%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-7.66%	+6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.40%	+0.09%

Volatility

EPSB vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 4.02%. This indicates that EPSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPSB	HGER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	4.02%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	14.54%	-3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	16.87%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	17.62%	-2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.38%	17.62%	-2.24%

EPSB vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSB has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPSB vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

EPSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than HGER's 5.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	1.15%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	5.53%	7.09%	3.28%	7.24%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPSB and HGER in my portfolio?

EPSB and HGER have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPSB or HGER?

EPSB has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to HGER (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSB dropped -8.46% vs HGER's -23.31%.

Which ETF is better, EPSB or HGER?

On 1-year performance, HGER leads with 41.90% vs 29.37% for EPSB. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPSB or HGER?

Over the 1-year period, HGER has performed better with a 41.90% return vs 29.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPSB or HGER?

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPSB or HGER?

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 1.15% for EPSB.

What is the main difference between EPSB and HGER?

EPSB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HGER is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSB and 0.68% for HGER.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.