PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPS vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPS vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPS achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.62% return.


EPS

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.89%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.50%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
14.89%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPS vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
11.42%17.40%23.97%22.81%-15.82%27.47%12.02%32.54%-10.84%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and NTSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.89

The correlation between EPS and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPS vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPS
NTSX

Technology

32.5%
35.1%

Financial Services

15.4%
12.3%

Communication Services

13.4%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.4%

Industrials

5.4%
7.7%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.5%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.5%

Technology

EPS
32.5%
NTSX
35.1%

Financial Services

EPS
15.4%
NTSX
12.3%

Communication Services

EPS
13.4%
NTSX
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EPS
10.9%
NTSX
10.1%

Healthcare

EPS
9.5%
NTSX
8.4%

Industrials

EPS
5.4%
NTSX
7.7%

Energy

EPS
4.4%
NTSX
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EPS
4.3%
NTSX
5.5%

Utilities

EPS
2.1%
NTSX
2.1%

Basic Materials

EPS
1.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Real Estate

EPS
0.9%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPS vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPS
EPS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPSNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.77

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.29

12.25

+4.04

EPS vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPSNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.06

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.57

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.71

-0.15

Drawdowns

EPS vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.43%

-31.34%

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-9.16%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-16.82%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-31.34%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.05%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-6.79%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.07%

-0.28%

Volatility

EPS vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) is 2.79%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that EPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.39%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

9.58%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

12.31%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

17.04%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

18.27%

-0.62%

EPS vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EPS vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
1.14%1.26%1.47%1.73%1.95%1.51%1.85%1.70%2.02%1.59%1.99%2.15%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EPS and NTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to EPS (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, EPS leads with 13.06% vs 9.69% for NTSX. On fees, EPS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EPS has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.

EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

EPS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.20% for NTSX.

EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPS and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer