EPS vs. ILCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPS (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - EPS tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPS returned 14.89%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

EPS vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPS achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EPS has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 14.89%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

EPS

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: 29.14%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: 13.06%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

ILCG

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 7.68%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 29.51%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPS vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPS WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund	11.42%	17.40%	23.97%	22.81%	-15.82%	27.47%	12.02%	32.54%	-7.52%	22.73%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	14.48%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-31.75%	24.33%	38.56%	33.22%	2.06%	30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and ILCG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2007	0.85

The correlation between EPS and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPS vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPS	ILCG
Technology	32.5%	49.8%
Financial Services	15.4%	6.0%
Communication Services	13.4%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	10.6%
Healthcare	9.5%	5.3%
Industrials	5.4%	8.3%
Energy	4.4%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	1.6%
Utilities	2.1%	0.8%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.1%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.4%

Return for Risk

EPS vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPS

EPS Risk / Return Rank: 77
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 46
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPS	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.82	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	2.45	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.32	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	1.89	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.29	6.68	+9.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPS vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPS	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	1.82	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.68	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.85	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.59	-0.03

Drawdowns

EPS vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, roughly equal to the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPS	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.43%	-52.98%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.39%	-15.65%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.65%	-23.10%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	-35.38%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.79%	-35.38%	-0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-1.02%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-8.22%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	4.43%	-2.64%

Volatility

EPS vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) is 2.79%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that EPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPS	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	4.40%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	12.81%	-4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.34%	16.31%	-4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	22.00%	-5.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	21.53%	-3.88%

EPS vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EPS vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPS WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund	1.14%	1.26%	1.47%	1.73%	1.95%	1.51%	1.85%	1.70%	2.02%	1.59%	1.99%	2.15%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.40%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPS and ILCG in my portfolio?

EPS and ILCG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPS or ILCG?

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to EPS (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

Which ETF is better, EPS or ILCG?

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.15% vs 14.89% for EPS. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPS or ILCG?

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 14.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPS or ILCG?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for EPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPS or ILCG?

EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

What is the main difference between EPS and ILCG?

EPS tracks WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.04% for ILCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.