PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) and RMAX.TO (Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both REIT funds. Over the past year, EPRA.L returned 12.77% vs 9.97% for RMAX.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for RMAX.TO.

Performance

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EPRA.L is traded in GBp, while RMAX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RMAX.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRA.L achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than RMAX.TO's 7.36% return.

EPRA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.50%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
—

RMAX.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
7.36%
6M
8.35%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
EPRA.L
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR		6.79%3.12%6.26%
RMAX.TO
Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF		7.36%2.58%5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRA.L and RMAX.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024

0.59

The correlation between EPRA.L and RMAX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EPRA.L
RMAX.TO

Real Estate

99.6%
100.0%

Technology

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

EPRA.L
99.6%
RMAX.TO
100.0%

Technology

EPRA.L
0.4%
RMAX.TO

-

Financial Services

EPRA.L
0.1%
RMAX.TO

-

Industrials

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Communication Services

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Healthcare

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Basic Materials

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Energy

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Utilities

EPRA.L
0.0%
RMAX.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR

Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

Often compared with EPRA.L:
EPRA.L vs. TRET.DEEPRA.L vs. TRET.ASEPRA.L vs. TREG.LEPRA.L vs. SPY2.DEEPRA.L vs. IQSA.DEEPRA.L vs. LCWD.LEPRA.L vs. VNQ
Often compared with RMAX.TO:
RMAX.TO vs. MREL.TORMAX.TO vs. RIT.TORMAX.TO vs. ZRE.TORMAX.TO vs. APR-UN.TORMAX.TO vs. HGR.TORMAX.TO vs. VRAIRMAX.TO vs. UKRE.L

Return for Risk

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EPRA.L
EPRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO
RMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EPRA.LRMAX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.21
0.90

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.80
1.32

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.65

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

4.16

+0.84

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the RMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRA.L and RMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EPRA.LRMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.90

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.61

-0.42

Drawdowns

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than RMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRA.L and RMAX.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPRA.LRMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-17.67%

-17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-6.05%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.01%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-2.10%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-5.29%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.40%

+0.15%

Volatility

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) is 3.19%, while Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that EPRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPRA.LRMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.61%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

8.54%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.18%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

13.32%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

13.32%

+2.18%

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RMAX.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPRA.L vs. RMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%.

PositionTTM20252024
EPRA.L
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR		0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMAX.TO
Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF		10.53%10.65%4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPRA.L and RMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RMAX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Hamilton ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EPRA.L and 0.79% for RMAX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPRA.L and RMAX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer