EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L
EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) and IWDP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRA.L returned 2.03%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for IWDP.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EPRA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IWDP.L.
Performance
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EPRA.L having a 6.79% return and IWDP.L slightly higher at 6.86%.
EPRA.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
IWDP.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 11.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 6.79% | 3.12% | 1.31% | 4.40% | -16.02% | 27.84% | -11.99% | 17.30% | -0.56% | 0.64% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 6.86% | 1.71% | 1.22% | 4.00% | -14.93% | 26.93% | -12.50% | 17.31% | -0.09% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRA.L and IWDP.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between EPRA.L and IWDP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (1 year) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
Real Estate
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
Technology
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Financial Services
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
Industrials
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
Communication Services
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Healthcare
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Basic Materials
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Energy
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Utilities
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank
EPRA.L
IWDP.L
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRA.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 4.13 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRA.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.13 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.26 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -58.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRA.L and IWDP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRA.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -58.29% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -8.61% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -16.50% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | -26.31% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -3.40% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -11.23% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.78% | -0.23% |
Volatility
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that EPRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRA.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.00% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 8.45% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 10.89% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 13.76% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.54% | -0.04% |
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison
EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWDP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 3.03% | 3.13% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.56% | 2.17% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.82% | 3.05% | 2.96% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRA.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EPRA.L and 0.59% for IWDP.L.
Find the right allocation for EPRA.L and IWDP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer