PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EPRA.L having a 6.79% return and IWDP.L slightly higher at 6.86%.


EPRA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.50%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*

IWDP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
6.86%
6M
7.06%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRA.L
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR
6.79%3.12%1.31%4.40%-16.02%27.84%-11.99%17.30%-0.56%0.64%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
6.86%1.71%1.22%4.00%-14.93%26.93%-12.50%17.31%-0.09%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRA.L and IWDP.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.96

The correlation between EPRA.L and IWDP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (1 year) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPRA.L
IWDP.L

Real Estate

99.6%
100.0%

Technology

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
0.1%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

EPRA.L
99.6%
IWDP.L
100.0%

Technology

EPRA.L
0.4%
IWDP.L

-

Financial Services

EPRA.L
0.1%
IWDP.L
0.1%

Industrials

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L
0.0%

Communication Services

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Healthcare

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Basic Materials

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Energy

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Utilities

EPRA.L
0.0%
IWDP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRA.L
EPRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDP.L
IWDP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRA.LIWDP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

4.13

+0.87

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRA.L and IWDP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRA.LIWDP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.05

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.13

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.26

-0.07

Drawdowns

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -58.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRA.L and IWDP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRA.LIWDP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-58.29%

+22.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-8.61%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.01%

-16.50%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-26.31%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-3.40%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-11.23%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.78%

-0.23%

Volatility

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that EPRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRA.LIWDP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.00%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

8.45%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

10.89%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

13.76%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

15.54%

-0.04%

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPRA.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison

EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWDP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPRA.L
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
3.03%3.13%3.17%3.14%3.56%2.17%3.11%3.03%3.82%3.05%2.96%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPRA.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EPRA.L and 0.59% for IWDP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPRA.L and IWDP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer