PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPR vs. PDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EPR vs. PDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPR Properties (EPR) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPR achieves a 23.29% return, which is significantly higher than PDD's -28.07% return.


EPR

1D
1.17%
1M
3.94%
YTD
23.29%
6M
23.59%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
3.90%

PDD

1D
0.32%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
-28.07%
6M
-27.15%
1Y
-18.91%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-7.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPR vs. PDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EPR
EPR Properties
23.29%20.52%-1.25%38.83%-14.61%50.60%-52.09%17.13%-0.83%
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
-28.07%16.91%-33.71%79.41%39.88%-67.19%369.78%68.54%-15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EPR and PDD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.10

The correlation between EPR and PDD shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EPR:

$4.58B

PDD:

$120.71B

EPS

EPR:

$3.55

PDD:

CN¥64.39

PE Ratio

EPR:

16.86

PDD:

8.58

PEG Ratio

EPR:

0.36

PDD:

0.08

PS Ratio

EPR:

6.54

PDD:

1.86

PB Ratio

EPR:

1.98

PDD:

1.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPR:

$700.22M

PDD:

CN¥441.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPR:

$568.77M

PDD:

CN¥247.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

EPR:

$582.57M

PDD:

CN¥134.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPR vs. PDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPR
EPR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PDD
PDD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPR vs. PDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPR Properties (EPR) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPRPDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.91

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

-0.52

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

-1.08

+2.23

EPR vs. PDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the PDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPR and PDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPR vs. PDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPR drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, smaller than the maximum PDD drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPR and PDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRPDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.02%

-87.41%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.51%

-41.14%

+21.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-48.40%

+28.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-80.88%

+45.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-59.79%

+59.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-39.32%

+22.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.81%

19.55%

-9.74%

Volatility

EPR vs. PDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EPR Properties (EPR) is 5.14%, while Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) has a volatility of 14.35%. This indicates that EPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRPDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

14.35%

-9.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

25.50%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

32.48%

-10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.16%

68.09%

-41.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.44%

69.37%

-26.93%

Dividends

EPR vs. PDD - Dividend Comparison

EPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, while PDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPR
EPR Properties
5.99%7.05%7.68%6.81%8.62%3.16%4.66%6.37%5.62%6.23%5.35%6.21%
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EPR vs. PDD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPR Properties and Pinduoduo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
181.25M
105.59B
(EPR) Total Revenue
(PDD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EPR values in USD, PDD values in CNY

EPR vs. PDD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EPR Properties and Pinduoduo Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.8%
55.9%
Portfolio components
EPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a gross profit of 180.96M and revenue of 181.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.8%.

PDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.98B and revenue of 105.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

EPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported an operating income of 100.62M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.5%.

PDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported an operating income of 21.02B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

EPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a net income of 62.61M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.

PDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a net income of 12.47B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EPR and PDD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDD has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to EPR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPR dropped -82.02% vs PDD's -87.41%.

EPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPR and PDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer