PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has outperformed FDD with an annualized return of 11.45%, while FDD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.58%
6M
22.93%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
35.67%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
11.45%

FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPOL vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
13.58%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and FDD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.65

The correlation between EPOL and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPOL vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPOL
FDD

Financial Services

45.6%
52.2%

Energy

14.6%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
12.3%

Basic Materials

6.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

6.3%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.7%

Utilities

5.1%
6.0%

Technology

1.9%

-

Industrials

1.7%
12.5%

Healthcare

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

3.5%

Financial Services

EPOL
45.6%
FDD
52.2%

Energy

EPOL
14.6%
FDD
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EPOL
12.4%
FDD
12.3%

Basic Materials

EPOL
6.6%
FDD
2.9%

Communication Services

EPOL
6.3%
FDD
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

EPOL
5.5%
FDD
3.7%

Utilities

EPOL
5.1%
FDD
6.0%

Technology

EPOL
1.9%
FDD

-

Industrials

EPOL
1.7%
FDD
12.5%

Healthcare

EPOL
0.3%
FDD

-

Real Estate

EPOL

-

FDD
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPOLFDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

2.16

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

2.98

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.53

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.07

11.86

-1.79

EPOL vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPOLFDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.16

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.10

+0.12

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-74.77%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-9.39%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-13.06%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-35.11%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-41.43%

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-2.26%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.89%

-35.47%

+8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

2.79%

+1.24%

Volatility

EPOL vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) at 5.22%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

5.22%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

12.35%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.20%

15.43%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.06%

18.39%

+10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

20.16%

+7.49%

EPOL vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FDD's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
4.21%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and FDD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FDD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 10-year performance, EPOL leads with 11.45% vs 9.96% for FDD. On fees, FDD is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDD is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.55% for FDD.

EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.58% for FDD.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer