PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 11.45%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.58%
6M
22.93%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
35.67%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
11.45%

EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPOL vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
13.58%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and EWT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.56

The correlation between EPOL and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPOL vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPOL
EWT

Financial Services

45.6%
13.0%

Energy

14.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
1.9%

Basic Materials

6.6%
3.5%

Communication Services

6.3%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
1.1%

Utilities

5.1%

-

Technology

1.9%
72.9%

Industrials

1.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

0.3%
0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

EPOL
45.6%
EWT
13.0%

Energy

EPOL
14.6%
EWT

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPOL
12.4%
EWT
1.9%

Basic Materials

EPOL
6.6%
EWT
3.5%

Communication Services

EPOL
6.3%
EWT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EPOL
5.5%
EWT
1.1%

Utilities

EPOL
5.1%
EWT

-

Technology

EPOL
1.9%
EWT
72.9%

Industrials

EPOL
1.7%
EWT
4.9%

Healthcare

EPOL
0.3%
EWT
0.8%

Real Estate

EPOL

-

EWT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPOLEWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

4.42

-2.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

5.00

-2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.69

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

10.56

-6.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.07

32.40

-22.33

EPOL vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPOLEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

4.42

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.82

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.92

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.26

-0.05

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-64.37%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-10.51%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-25.66%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-38.88%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-38.88%

-22.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.20%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.89%

-19.23%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.42%

+0.61%

Volatility

EPOL vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) is 7.84%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that EPOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

10.43%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

20.52%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.20%

25.10%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.06%

22.59%

+6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

21.60%

+6.05%

EPOL vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
4.21%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and EWT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to EPOL (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.90% vs 11.45% for EPOL. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPOL has been the lower-risk option at 7.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.90% return vs 11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.63% for EWT.

EPOL is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.59% for EWT.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer