PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPMV vs. SIFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPMV vs. SIFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPMV achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than SIFI's 1.12% return.


EPMV

1D
1.62%
1M
6.13%
YTD
18.27%
6M
20.75%
1Y
31.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIFI

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.44%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPMV vs. SIFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EPMV
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
18.27%13.68%
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
1.12%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EPMV and SIFI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

0.42

EPMV vs. SIFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPMV
SIFI

Industrials

21.7%
16.2%

Technology

18.7%
15.7%

Financial Services

18.1%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.8%

Basic Materials

6.7%
0.7%

Healthcare

6.7%
3.9%

Real Estate

6.4%
4.8%

Energy

5.0%
7.9%

Utilities

3.0%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
2.9%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Industrials

EPMV
21.7%
SIFI
16.2%

Technology

EPMV
18.7%
SIFI
15.7%

Financial Services

EPMV
18.1%
SIFI
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EPMV
12.2%
SIFI
11.8%

Basic Materials

EPMV
6.7%
SIFI
0.7%

Healthcare

EPMV
6.7%
SIFI
3.9%

Real Estate

EPMV
6.4%
SIFI
4.8%

Energy

EPMV
5.0%
SIFI
7.9%

Utilities

EPMV
3.0%
SIFI
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EPMV
1.4%
SIFI
2.9%

Communication Services

EPMV

-

SIFI
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPMV vs. SIFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPMV
EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFI
SIFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SIFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPMV vs. SIFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPMVSIFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

2.16

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

3.31

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.70

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.73

11.05

+0.68

EPMV vs. SIFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SIFI Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPMV and SIFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPMVSIFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.16

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

0.47

+1.58

Drawdowns

EPMV vs. SIFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPMV drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum SIFI drawdown of -14.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMV and SIFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPMVSIFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-14.68%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-2.71%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-4.82%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

0.66%

+2.00%

Volatility

EPMV vs. SIFI - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) at 1.02%. This indicates that EPMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPMVSIFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

1.02%

+4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

2.47%

+8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

3.39%

+11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

4.93%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

4.93%

+10.58%

EPMV vs. SIFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPMV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFI's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPMV vs. SIFI - Dividend Comparison

EPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than SIFI's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EPMV
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
1.25%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
6.45%6.57%5.87%5.71%3.88%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPMV and SIFI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPMV has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to SIFI (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPMV dropped -8.78% vs SIFI's -14.68%.

On 1-year performance, EPMV leads with 31.44% vs 7.30% for SIFI. On fees, SIFI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPMV has performed better with a 31.44% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIFI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.

SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.

EPMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SIFI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMV and 0.50% for SIFI.

SIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPMV and SIFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer