EPMV vs. DIV
EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. EPMV is actively managed, while DIV is passively managed. Over the past year, EPMV returned 27.69% vs 15.53% for DIV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPMV charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
EPMV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPMV achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than DIV's 13.39% return.
EPMV
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
EPMV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF | 18.03% | 14.19% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPMV and DIV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between EPMV and DIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPMV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPMV
DIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
EPMV
DIV
Industrials
EPMV
DIV
Technology
EPMV
DIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EPMV
DIV
Healthcare
EPMV
DIV
Real Estate
EPMV
DIV
Basic Materials
EPMV
DIV
Energy
EPMV
DIV
Utilities
EPMV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
EPMV
DIV
Communication Services
EPMV
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPMV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
EPMV
DIV
EPMV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPMV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.98 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 8.09 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPMV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPMV drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPMV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -52.74% | +43.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -5.23% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.67% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -7.01% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 1.92% | +0.75% |
Volatility
EPMV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.68%. This indicates that EPMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPMV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 3.68% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 7.54% | +4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 10.64% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 13.69% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 18.00% | -2.41% |
EPMV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPMV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPMV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
EPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than DIV's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.25% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPMV and DIV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPMV has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPMV dropped -8.78% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 1-year performance, EPMV leads with 27.69% vs 15.53% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPMV has performed better with a 27.69% return vs 15.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMV and 0.45% for DIV.
EPMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPMV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer