EPIVX vs. FISZX
EPIVX (EuroPac International Value Fund) and FISZX (Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EPIVX returned 10.41%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for FISZX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPIVX charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FISZX.
Performance
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPIVX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 31.45% return.
EPIVX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -4.13%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
FISZX
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 31.45%
- 6M
- 33.58%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPIVX EuroPac International Value Fund | -3.11% | 47.14% | 5.08% | 9.80% | 0.47% | 7.11% | 18.37% | 7.64% |
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund | 31.45% | 31.77% | 3.61% | 15.83% | -28.32% | 9.91% | 23.49% | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPIVX and FISZX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EPIVX and FISZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPIVX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank
EPIVX
FISZX
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac International Value Fund (EPIVX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPIVX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 3.38 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 13.11 | -9.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPIVX drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIVX and FISZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPIVX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.27% | -39.92% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -14.48% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.92% | -14.63% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -39.92% | +18.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.15% | 0.00% | -13.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -12.30% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 3.72% | +1.52% |
Volatility
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EuroPac International Value Fund (EPIVX) is 5.61%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that EPIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPIVX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 10.46% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 18.55% | -4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 20.87% | -3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 18.29% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 18.53% | -3.14% |
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPIVX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPIVX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison
EPIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than FISZX's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPIVX EuroPac International Value Fund | 7.73% | 7.23% | 1.84% | 2.22% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 0.88% | 2.63% | 1.61% | 1.57% | 0.69% | 2.31% |
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund | 1.46% | 1.92% | 2.55% | 1.89% | 1.37% | 6.08% | 0.90% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPIVX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FISZX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to EPIVX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIVX dropped -46.27% vs FISZX's -39.92%.
FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPIVX and FISZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer