EPHE vs. MKOR
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. EPHE is passively managed, while MKOR is actively managed. Over the past year, EPHE returned -9.52% vs 187.66% for MKOR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MKOR.
Performance
EPHE vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 96.84% return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- -9.52%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
MKOR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 16.82%
- YTD
- 96.84%
- 6M
- 107.34%
- 1Y
- 187.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPHE vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | -1.12% | 1.56% | -1.41% | -2.88% |
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF | 96.84% | 70.33% | -15.76% | -2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and MKOR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023 | 0.36 |
EPHE vs. MKOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPHE
MKOR
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
EPHE
MKOR
Financial Services
EPHE
MKOR
Utilities
EPHE
MKOR
Consumer Cyclical
EPHE
MKOR
Real Estate
EPHE
MKOR
-
Communication Services
EPHE
MKOR
Consumer Defensive
EPHE
MKOR
Energy
EPHE
MKOR
Basic Materials
EPHE
MKOR
Healthcare
EPHE
-
MKOR
Technology
EPHE
-
MKOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
MKOR
EPHE vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPHE | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 5.08 | -5.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | 4.94 | -5.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.70 | -0.77 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 9.16 | -9.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 35.31 | -36.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPHE | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 5.08 | -5.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.57 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and MKOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -22.09% | -31.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -20.62% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.62% | -2.27% | -32.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -6.22% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 5.34% | +3.74% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is 5.60%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that EPHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | MKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 17.87% | -12.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 33.29% | -19.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 37.15% | -18.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 27.06% | -9.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 27.06% | -4.82% |
EPHE vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MKOR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than MKOR's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.13% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF | 1.33% | 2.62% | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and MKOR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKOR has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to EPHE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs MKOR's -22.09%.
On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 187.66% vs -9.52% for EPHE. On fees, EPHE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 187.66% return vs -9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPHE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.
EPHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.33% for MKOR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.79% for MKOR.
MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and MKOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer