EPHE vs. FLIN
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EPHE tracks the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index while FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPHE returned -3.12%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for FLIN. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
EPHE vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.92% return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- -9.52%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- -11.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
EPHE vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | -1.12% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -11.72% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -11.92% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and FLIN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between EPHE and FLIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPHE vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPHE
FLIN
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
EPHE
FLIN
Financial Services
EPHE
FLIN
Utilities
EPHE
FLIN
Consumer Cyclical
EPHE
FLIN
Real Estate
EPHE
FLIN
Communication Services
EPHE
FLIN
Consumer Defensive
EPHE
FLIN
Energy
EPHE
FLIN
Basic Materials
EPHE
FLIN
Healthcare
EPHE
-
FLIN
Technology
EPHE
-
FLIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
FLIN
EPHE vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPHE | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.88 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.62 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | -1.54 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPHE | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | -0.78 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.23 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.26 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -41.90% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -18.79% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -22.85% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -22.85% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.62% | -18.91% | -15.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -8.01% | -12.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 7.57% | +1.51% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 5.21%. This indicates that EPHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 5.21% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 12.81% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 14.92% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 15.74% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 20.45% | +1.79% |
EPHE vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.13% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and FLIN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPHE has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to FLIN (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs FLIN's -41.90%.
On 5-year performance, FLIN leads with 3.56% vs -3.12% for EPHE. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLIN has performed better with a 3.56% return vs -3.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPHE.
EPHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.
EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.19% for FLIN.
EPHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer