EPGCX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
EPGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGCX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C | -5.64% | 13.38% | 9.87% | 34.16% | -25.24% | 21.72% | 42.18% | 32.59% | -0.65% | 33.80% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -3.30% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPGCX achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -3.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPGCX having a 14.04% annualized return and FSKAX not far behind at 13.64%.
EPGCX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
FSKAX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- 17.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGCX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPGCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
EPGCX
FSKAX
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.99 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 1.52 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.53 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 7.26 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.99 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.74 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.79 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGCX and FSKAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
EPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FSKAX's 1.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGCX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C | 0.93% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 2.99% | 15.94% | 14.57% | 11.69% | 8.45% | 13.66% | 7.31% | 2.67% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.05% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGCX drawdown since its inception was -65.66%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGCX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -35.01% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -8.92% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | -25.39% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.74% | -35.01% | +1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.38% | -5.53% | -6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.04% | -4.06% | -13.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 2.62% | +1.13% |
Volatility
EPGCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 5.53%. This indicates that EPGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 5.53% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 9.87% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 18.70% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 17.42% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 18.44% | +2.60% |