EPDPX vs. FACNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EPDPX (EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A) and FACNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EPDPX returned 9.81%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for FACNX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPDPX charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for FACNX.

Performance

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPDPX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly higher than FACNX's 4.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPDPX having a 9.81% annualized return and FACNX not far ahead at 10.10%.

EPDPX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 35.78%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

FACNX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 4.37%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 14.15%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPDPX EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A	7.93%	61.93%	0.72%	7.46%	1.27%	7.78%	8.83%	13.05%	-11.02%	15.53%
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A	4.37%	25.49%	8.83%	14.33%	-6.44%	26.44%	4.11%	25.42%	-14.59%	12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EPDPX and FACNX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2014	0.72

The correlation between EPDPX and FACNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EPDPX vs. FACNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPDPX

EPDPX Risk / Return Rank: 74
EPDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EPDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EPDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EPDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EPDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FACNX

FACNX Risk / Return Rank: 22
FACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPDPX	FACNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.12	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.57	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.20	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	1.91	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	6.15	+5.13

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPDPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the FACNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPDPX and FACNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPDPX drawdown since its inception was -39.21%, smaller than the maximum FACNX drawdown of -58.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPDPX and FACNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPDPX	FACNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.21%	-58.18%	+18.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.96%	-7.63%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-12.16%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.06%	-21.12%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.34%	-39.88%	+6.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.66%	-3.80%	-3.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.17%	-12.14%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	2.36%	+0.86%

Volatility

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Volatility Comparison

EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) at 3.98%. This indicates that EPDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPDPX	FACNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	3.98%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	10.23%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.51%	12.97%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.14%	16.00%	-1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	17.44%	-2.52%

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPDPX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FACNX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPDPX vs. FACNX - Dividend Comparison

EPDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than FACNX's 5.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPDPX EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A	6.21%	6.55%	3.82%	3.08%	2.56%	2.07%	1.70%	2.43%	2.66%	2.69%	2.24%	3.58%
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A	5.18%	5.41%	7.14%	3.06%	3.79%	4.86%	2.28%	4.13%	6.91%	0.89%	1.31%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPDPX and FACNX in my portfolio?

EPDPX and FACNX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPDPX or FACNX?

EPDPX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FACNX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPDPX dropped -39.21% vs FACNX's -58.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPDPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.