PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPASX vs. DRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPASX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (EPASX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPASX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRESX's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EPASX has underperformed DRESX with an annualized return of 6.02%, while DRESX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.


EPASX

1D
1.54%
1M
1.21%
YTD
7.08%
6M
7.21%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
6.02%

DRESX

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
20.68%
6M
22.24%
1Y
43.20%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPASX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPASX
EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
7.08%25.43%0.64%7.15%-28.73%9.75%27.20%14.82%-21.57%34.40%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
20.68%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-24.00%33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EPASX and DRESX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.75

The correlation between EPASX and DRESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPASX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPASX
EPASX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EPASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPASX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EPASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPASX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPASX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (EPASX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPASXDRESXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

2.93

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

3.93

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.55

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.33

-2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.19

14.43

-7.24

EPASX vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPASX and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPASXDRESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.93

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.63

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.73

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.59

-0.28

Drawdowns

EPASX vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPASX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than DRESX's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPASX and DRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPASXDRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.54%

-33.38%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-10.16%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.18%

-17.65%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.01%

-25.88%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-33.38%

-8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-4.80%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.65%

-9.91%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.05%

+0.08%

Volatility

EPASX vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (EPASX) is 4.45%, while Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that EPASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPASXDRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

6.10%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

13.07%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

15.40%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

14.71%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

15.90%

-0.70%

EPASX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPASX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPASX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

EPASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than DRESX's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
1.86%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPASX
EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
1.82%1.95%2.00%1.20%0.50%21.67%0.54%0.27%11.18%4.20%1.50%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPASX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRESX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to EPASX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPASX dropped -41.54% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

DRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPASX and DRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer