EPAI vs. KNCT
EPAI (Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF) and KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. EPAI is actively managed, while KNCT is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPAI charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for KNCT.
Performance
EPAI vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPAI achieves a 48.89% return, which is significantly lower than KNCT's 54.15% return.
EPAI
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 48.89%
- 6M
- 46.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNCT
- 1D
- -5.38%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 54.15%
- 6M
- 54.94%
- 1Y
- 84.85%
- 3Y*
- 40.93%
- 5Y*
- 19.32%
- 10Y*
- 21.11%
EPAI vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF | 48.89% | -0.33% |
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 54.15% | 4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPAI and KNCT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPAI vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank
EPAI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNCT
EPAI vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPAI | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.57 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 30.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPAI vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPAI drawdown since its inception was -12.31%, smaller than the maximum KNCT drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAI and KNCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPAI | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -57.18% | +44.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -6.27% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -10.73% | +8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility
EPAI vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPAI | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.26% | 25.15% | +8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.26% | 23.96% | +9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.26% | 23.33% | +9.93% |
EPAI vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPAI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than KNCT's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPAI vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison
EPAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.62% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPAI and KNCT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPAI.
KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for EPAI.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPAI and 0.40% for KNCT.
Find the right allocation for EPAI and KNCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer