EOSU vs. LULG
EOSU (T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EOSU is passively managed, while LULG is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EOSU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
EOSU vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EOSU
- 1D
- -13.53%
- 1M
- -50.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG
- 1D
- 7.44%
- 1M
- -24.05%
- YTD
- -75.09%
- 6M
- -75.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EOSU vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF | -95.64% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -75.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EOSU and LULG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EOSU vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EOSU vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOSU drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSU and LULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOSU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -79.88% | -17.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.69% | -76.93% | -19.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.88% | -36.96% | -43.92% |
Volatility
EOSU vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EOSU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 258.56% | 88.55% | +170.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 258.56% | 88.55% | +170.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 258.56% | 88.55% | +170.01% |
EOSU vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EOSU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EOSU vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
Neither EOSU nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EOSU and LULG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for EOSU.
EOSU and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for EOSU and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for EOSU and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer