EOSU vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EOSU (T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EOSU is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EOSU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

EOSU vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EOSU

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: 46.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: 11.82%
• 1M: -43.79%
• YTD: -72.19%
• 6M: -85.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOSU vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF	-92.95%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-79.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EOSU and BMNG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

EOSU vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EOSU	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	-0.52	+0.14

Drawdowns

EOSU vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOSU drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSU and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOSU	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.44%	-95.36%	-2.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.60%	-94.82%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.71%	-81.47%	+1.76%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EOSU	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	262.56%	191.69%	+70.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	262.56%	191.69%	+70.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	262.56%	191.69%	+70.87%

EOSU vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOSU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EOSU vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither EOSU nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOSU and BMNG in my portfolio?

EOSU and BMNG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EOSU or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EOSU or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for EOSU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EOSU or BMNG?

EOSU and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EOSU and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for EOSU and 0.75% for BMNG.