PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOSE vs. MRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EOSE vs. MRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOSE achieves a -47.12% return, which is significantly lower than MRK's 13.94% return.


EOSE

1D
-2.26%
1M
-22.95%
YTD
-47.12%
6M
-59.16%
1Y
50.37%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
-21.15%
10Y*

MRK

1D
-1.42%
1M
6.89%
YTD
13.94%
6M
20.60%
1Y
50.99%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOSE vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EOSE
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc
-47.12%135.80%345.87%-26.35%-80.32%-63.92%112.65%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
13.94%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EOSE and MRK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EOSE:

$3.30B

MRK:

$294.29B

EPS

EOSE:

-$1.45

MRK:

$3.58

PS Ratio

EOSE:

12.40

MRK:

4.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

EOSE:

$160.71M

MRK:

$65.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EOSE:

-$163.73M

MRK:

$49.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

EOSE:

-$858.77M

MRK:

$22.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOSE vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOSE
EOSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EOSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EOSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOSE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOSE vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EOSEMRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

4.49

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

11.22

-10.06

EOSE vs. MRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the MRK Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOSE and MRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EOSE vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOSE drawdown since its inception was -97.88%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSE and MRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOSEMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.88%

-68.61%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.10%

-11.37%

-65.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.18%

-43.44%

-43.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.77%

-43.44%

-53.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.09%

-5.03%

-75.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.37%

-18.83%

-53.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.66%

4.54%

+35.12%

Volatility

EOSE vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison

Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) has a higher volatility of 31.08% compared to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) at 9.57%. This indicates that EOSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOSEMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.08%

9.57%

+21.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.90%

18.04%

+73.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.13%

27.18%

+87.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.06%

23.66%

+93.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.92%

22.96%

+89.96%

Dividends

EOSE vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison

EOSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EOSE
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.79%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%

Financials

EOSE vs. MRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eos Energy Enterprises Inc and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
56.96M
16.29B
(EOSE) Total Revenue
(MRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EOSE and MRK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EOSE has higher volatility (31.08%) compared to MRK (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOSE dropped -97.88% vs MRK's -68.61%.

MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOSE and MRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer