EOSE vs. LUNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EOSE (Eos Energy Enterprises Inc) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — EOSE in Electrical Equipment & Parts, LUNR in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 3 years, EOSE returned 23.72%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EOSE vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOSE achieves a -47.12% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.

EOSE

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -26.81%
• YTD: -47.12%
• 6M: -59.16%
• 1Y: 45.67%
• 3Y*: 23.72%
• 5Y*: -21.15%
• 10Y*: —

LUNR

• 1D: -13.12%
• 1M: -25.39%
• YTD: 64.02%
• 6M: 122.39%
• 1Y: 144.44%
• 3Y*: 42.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOSE vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc	-47.12%	135.80%	345.87%	-26.35%	-80.32%	-31.39%
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	64.02%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EOSE and LUNR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.20

Over the past year, EOSE and LUNR have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap EOSE : $3.30B LUNR : $3.94T
EPS EOSE : -$1.45 LUNR : -$0.00
PS Ratio EOSE : 12.40 LUNR : 2.95K
Total Revenue (TTM) EOSE : $160.71M LUNR : $334.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) EOSE : -$163.73M LUNR : $85.92M
EBITDA (TTM) EOSE : -$858.77M LUNR : -$96.76M

Return for Risk

EOSE vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOSE

EOSE Risk / Return Rank: 60
EOSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EOSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EOSE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EOSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EOSE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 81
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOSE vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EOSE	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.31	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.24	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.26	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	3.47	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.16	7.12	-5.97

EOSE vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOSE and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EOSE vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOSE drawdown since its inception was -97.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSE and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOSE	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.88%	-97.43%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.10%	-41.94%	-35.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.18%	-78.54%	-8.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.09%	-67.53%	-12.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.37%	-63.21%	-9.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.66%	20.37%	+19.29%

Volatility

EOSE vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) is 31.08%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that EOSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EOSE	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.08%	42.95%	-11.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	91.90%	93.42%	-1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.13%	111.16%	+3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.06%	171.29%	-54.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.92%	171.29%	-58.37%

Dividends

EOSE vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EOSE nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOSE and LUNR in my portfolio?

EOSE and LUNR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EOSE or LUNR?

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to EOSE (31.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOSE dropped -97.88% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.