PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOS vs. TCBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EOS vs. TCBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EOS vs. TCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
-10.77%5.77%38.69%22.59%-26.50%20.30%29.45%30.32%2.77%27.89%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
0.83%12.61%4.09%4.09%0.05%18.21%-1.71%18.73%-3.93%9.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOS achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly lower than TCBIX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EOS has outperformed TCBIX with an annualized return of 12.63%, while TCBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.


EOS

1D
5.19%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-10.77%
6M
-10.96%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
12.63%

TCBIX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
0.83%
6M
3.27%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
6.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EOS vs. TCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TCBIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EOS vs. TCBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOS
EOS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TCBIX
TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOS vs. TCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EOSTCBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.95

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

1.43

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.21

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

1.10

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.09

5.04

-3.95

EOS vs. TCBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the TCBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOS and TCBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EOSTCBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.95

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.51

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.51

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between EOS and TCBIX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EOS vs. TCBIX - Dividend Comparison

EOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than TCBIX's 8.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
8.93%7.81%7.17%7.38%9.69%5.60%5.01%6.65%7.16%6.90%8.20%7.70%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
8.78%8.24%7.47%7.34%8.09%6.00%4.70%6.77%11.55%7.32%7.32%5.36%

Drawdowns

EOS vs. TCBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOS drawdown since its inception was -55.74%, which is greater than TCBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOS and TCBIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EOSTCBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-28.94%

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-10.24%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-17.07%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.12%

-28.94%

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.81%

-5.26%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-3.51%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

2.23%

+2.83%

Volatility

EOS vs. TCBIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) at 2.10%. This indicates that EOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EOSTCBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

2.10%

+5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

6.16%

+5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.34%

13.05%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

12.10%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

13.54%

+7.11%