PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOS vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EOS vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOS achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 11.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EOS having a 13.45% annualized return and QQQX not far behind at 13.19%.


EOS

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.11%
6M
-1.31%
YTD
-1.39%
1Y
-1.01%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
13.45%

QQQX

1D
-0.72%
1M
0.23%
6M
11.06%
YTD
11.14%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOS vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
-1.39%5.77%38.69%22.59%-26.50%20.30%29.45%30.32%2.77%27.89%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
11.14%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EOS and QQQX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.69

The correlation between EOS and QQQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOS vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOS
EOS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOS vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EOSQQQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.30

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

2.84

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

10.99

-11.18

EOS vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOS and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EOS vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOS drawdown since its inception was -55.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOS and QQQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOSQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-57.25%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-9.11%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.31%

-22.80%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-29.33%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.12%

-35.96%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-2.36%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-8.00%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

2.35%

+3.14%

Volatility

EOS vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) is 4.20%, while Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that EOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOSQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

6.75%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

13.26%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

15.75%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

20.05%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

21.14%

-0.39%

EOS vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EOS vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

EOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, which matches QQQX's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
8.25%7.81%7.17%7.38%9.69%5.60%5.01%6.65%7.16%6.90%8.20%7.70%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
8.17%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


EOS and QQQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to EOS (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOS dropped -55.74% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOS and QQQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer