PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOS vs. GIDHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EOS vs. GIDHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOS achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than GIDHX's 9.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EOS has outperformed GIDHX with an annualized return of 13.75%, while GIDHX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.68% annualized return.


EOS

1D
-0.87%
1M
2.65%
YTD
0.67%
6M
3.29%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
13.75%

GIDHX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.64%
YTD
9.50%
6M
11.89%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOS vs. GIDHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
0.67%5.77%38.69%22.59%-26.50%20.30%29.45%30.32%2.77%27.89%
GIDHX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
9.50%28.92%-2.17%16.16%-13.41%9.36%1.20%14.82%-12.96%23.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EOS and GIDHX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.60

The correlation between EOS and GIDHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOS vs. GIDHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOS
EOS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDHX
GIDHX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GIDHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOS vs. GIDHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EOSGIDHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.38

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

9.58

-8.37

EOS vs. GIDHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the GIDHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOS and GIDHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EOSGIDHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.47

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.44

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Drawdowns

EOS vs. GIDHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOS drawdown since its inception was -55.74%, which is greater than GIDHX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOS and GIDHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOSGIDHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-36.19%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-8.14%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.31%

-12.88%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-28.46%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.12%

-36.19%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.27%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-8.18%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

2.02%

+3.25%

Volatility

EOS vs. GIDHX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) have volatilities of 3.93% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOSGIDHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.10%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

10.70%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

13.23%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

14.79%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

15.42%

+5.29%

EOS vs. GIDHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDHX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EOS vs. GIDHX - Dividend Comparison

EOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than GIDHX's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
8.03%7.81%7.17%7.38%9.69%5.60%5.01%6.65%7.16%6.90%8.20%7.70%
GIDHX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
2.66%2.58%3.27%3.56%0.58%3.09%2.65%3.24%3.42%2.54%3.08%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


EOS and GIDHX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIDHX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to EOS (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOS dropped -55.74% vs GIDHX's -36.19%.

GIDHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOS and GIDHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer