PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOS vs. EIAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EOS vs. EIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOS achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than EIAMX's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EOS has outperformed EIAMX with an annualized return of 13.75%, while EIAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.86% annualized return.


EOS

1D
-0.87%
1M
2.65%
YTD
0.67%
6M
3.29%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
13.75%

EIAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.81%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
4.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOS vs. EIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
0.67%5.77%38.69%22.59%-26.50%20.30%29.45%30.32%2.77%27.89%
EIAMX
Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund
1.46%6.31%8.22%9.93%-6.18%4.57%1.89%11.67%-2.45%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EOS and EIAMX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOS vs. EIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOS
EOS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EIAMX
EIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOS vs. EIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) and Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EOSEIAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.78

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.65

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

17.14

-15.93

EOS vs. EIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the EIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOS and EIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EOSEIAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

2.30

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.31

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.22

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.23

+0.21

Drawdowns

EOS vs. EIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOS drawdown since its inception was -55.74%, which is greater than EIAMX's maximum drawdown of -43.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOS and EIAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOSEIAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-43.35%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-1.52%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.31%

-2.95%

-21.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-10.02%

-24.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.12%

-43.35%

+2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-8.87%

+7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-16.13%

+8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

0.32%

+4.95%

Volatility

EOS vs. EIAMX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II (EOS) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) at 0.62%. This indicates that EOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOSEIAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

0.62%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

1.78%

+10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

2.42%

+12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

3.20%

+16.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

22.48%

-1.77%

EOS vs. EIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than EIAMX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

EOS vs. EIAMX - Dividend Comparison

EOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than EIAMX's 6.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIAMX
Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund
6.88%7.04%7.35%5.52%5.46%4.10%4.46%4.94%2.41%2.88%3.15%3.77%
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
8.03%7.81%7.17%7.38%9.69%5.60%5.01%6.65%7.16%6.90%8.20%7.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


EOS and EIAMX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EOS has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to EIAMX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOS dropped -55.74% vs EIAMX's -43.35%.

EIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOS and EIAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer