EONR vs. BATL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EON Resources Inc (EONR) and Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL).

Performance

EONR vs. BATL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EON Resources Inc (EONR) and Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EONR vs. BATL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EONR EON Resources Inc	109.35%	-53.15%	-59.52%	-80.21%	1.99%
BATL Battalion Oil Corporation	240.71%	-34.30%	-82.10%	-1.03%	-50.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EONR : $44.20M BATL : $63.36M
EPS EONR : $0.07 BATL : $0.72
PE Ratio EONR : 11.70 BATL : 5.33
PS Ratio EONR : 1.80 BATL : 0.38
Total Revenue (TTM) EONR : $17.31M BATL : $164.96M
Gross Profit (TTM) EONR : $13.81M BATL : $120.16M
EBITDA (TTM) EONR : $16.68M BATL : $99.76M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EONR achieves a 109.35% return, which is significantly lower than BATL's 240.71% return.

EONR

• 1D: -3.12%
• 1M: 61.47%
• YTD: 109.35%
• 6M: 37.76%
• 1Y: 61.17%
• 3Y*: -57.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATL

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -67.37%
• YTD: 240.71%
• 6M: 234.78%
• 1Y: 187.31%
• 3Y*: -16.32%
• 5Y*: -20.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EONR vs. BATL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EONR

EONR Risk / Return Rank: 64
EONR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EONR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EONR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EONR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EONR Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BATL

BATL Risk / Return Rank: 81
BATL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BATL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BATL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BATL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BATL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EONR vs. BATL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EON Resources Inc (EONR) and Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EONR	BATL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.61	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	4.01	-2.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.57	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.28	-0.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.21	4.03	-1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EONR vs. BATL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EONR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the BATL Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EONR and BATL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EONR	BATL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	0.61	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-0.09	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between EONR and BATL is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EONR vs. BATL - Dividend Comparison

Neither EONR nor BATL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EONR vs. BATL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EONR drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, roughly equal to the maximum BATL drawdown of -95.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EONR and BATL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EONR	BATL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-95.23%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.17%	-86.09%	+33.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-95.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.37%	-86.09%	-7.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.02%	-58.48%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.44%	48.71%	-18.27%

Volatility

EONR vs. BATL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EON Resources Inc (EONR) is 71.10%, while Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) has a volatility of 89.30%. This indicates that EONR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EONR	BATL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	71.10%	89.30%	-18.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	98.58%	204.91%	-106.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	123.70%	311.15%	-187.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	142.52%	171.18%	-28.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	142.52%	167.66%	-25.14%

Financials