PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOI vs. ENHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EOI vs. ENHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund (EOI) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOI achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than ENHNX's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EOI has outperformed ENHNX with an annualized return of 12.42%, while ENHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.


EOI

1D
0.66%
1M
0.77%
6M
-1.84%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
12.42%
ALL TIME*
8.76%

ENHNX

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
6M
7.50%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
7.09%
ALL TIME*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.29M$1.21M$1.34M

EOI vs. ENHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
0.77%7.21%35.73%20.67%-19.78%32.93%9.59%31.97%-4.26%26.31%
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
12.04%6.20%6.89%0.99%-1.98%21.67%1.52%18.16%-5.10%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EOI and ENHNX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between EOI and ENHNX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOI vs. ENHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EOI
EOI Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOI Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ENHNX
ENHNX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ENHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ENHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EOI vs. ENHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund (EOI) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EOIENHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

2.27

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

6.04

-5.52

EOI vs. ENHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOI Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the ENHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOI and ENHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EOI vs. ENHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOI drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than ENHNX's maximum drawdown of -35.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOI and ENHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOIENHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.72%

-35.59%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-6.34%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.15%

-13.60%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-18.30%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.01%

-35.59%

-4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.57%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-4.02%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.40%

+1.59%

Volatility

EOI vs. ENHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund (EOI) is 3.95%, while Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that EOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOIENHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.19%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

7.88%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

10.54%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

12.87%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

15.46%

+4.45%

EOI vs. ENHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOI has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ENHNX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EOI vs. ENHNX - Dividend Comparison

EOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than ENHNX's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
5.69%4.38%5.99%6.22%3.82%7.77%5.86%5.69%6.45%6.82%7.67%0.00%
EOI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
8.12%7.81%7.38%7.93%8.80%5.83%6.66%6.78%8.01%7.15%8.36%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


EOI and ENHNX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENHNX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to EOI (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOI dropped -53.72% vs ENHNX's -35.59%.

ENHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOI and ENHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer