EOD vs. CDDYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EOD (Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund) and CDDYX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class) are both mutual funds - EOD is a Dividend fund managed by Wells Fargo, while CDDYX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, EOD returned 11.79%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for CDDYX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EOD charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CDDYX.

Performance

EOD vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOD achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than CDDYX's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EOD has underperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 11.79%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.

EOD

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: 17.52%
• 6M: 19.34%
• 1Y: 38.38%
• 3Y*: 28.51%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

CDDYX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 6M: 8.50%
• 1Y: 20.48%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOD vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund	17.52%	28.76%	25.83%	9.78%	-17.65%	32.87%	-3.16%	35.96%	-12.05%	20.46%
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class	8.15%	15.95%	15.17%	10.65%	-4.84%	26.43%	7.92%	28.74%	-4.27%	20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EOD and CDDYX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012	0.57

The correlation between EOD and CDDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EOD vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOD

EOD Risk / Return Rank: 82
EOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EOD Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EOD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CDDYX

CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 68
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOD vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EOD	CDDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.33	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.33	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.41	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	3.83	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.65	14.44	+7.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EOD vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOD and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EOD	CDDYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.33	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.82	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.81	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.88	-0.64

Drawdowns

EOD vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOD drawdown since its inception was -57.02%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOD and CDDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOD	CDDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.02%	-32.74%	-24.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-5.51%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-12.99%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.61%	-16.91%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.08%	-32.74%	-14.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.30%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-2.77%	-10.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.46%	+0.32%

Volatility

EOD vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.48%. This indicates that EOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EOD	CDDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	2.48%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	6.87%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	9.07%	+5.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.54%	13.27%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	15.69%	+3.41%

EOD vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

EOD vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

EOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than CDDYX's 4.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class	4.97%	5.33%	5.99%	4.96%	3.90%	2.93%	1.85%	3.28%	7.65%	4.03%	3.84%	8.35%
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund	7.78%	8.73%	9.16%	9.98%	11.80%	8.76%	11.41%	10.36%	13.84%	10.56%	9.91%	12.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOD and CDDYX in my portfolio?

EOD and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EOD or CDDYX?

EOD has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to CDDYX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOD dropped -57.02% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.