EOD vs. AOD
EOD (Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund) is Dividend fund managed by Wells Fargo, while AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EOD returned 11.89%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for AOD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EOD charges 0.02%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AOD.
Performance
EOD vs. AOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EOD achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than AOD's 9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EOD has underperformed AOD with an annualized return of 11.89%, while AOD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
EOD
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 32.59%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
AOD
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 31.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
EOD vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund | 15.31% | 28.76% | 25.83% | 9.78% | -17.65% | 32.87% | -3.16% | 35.96% | -12.05% | 20.46% |
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 9.89% | 32.14% | 16.03% | 12.65% | -17.15% | 23.80% | 8.12% | 34.83% | -17.63% | 35.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EOD and AOD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EOD and AOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EOD vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank
EOD
AOD
EOD vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EOD | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.87 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 8.05 | +9.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EOD vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOD drawdown since its inception was -57.02%, smaller than the maximum AOD drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOD and AOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOD | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.02% | -72.26% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -16.71% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -16.71% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -28.92% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.08% | -43.68% | -3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -4.16% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -27.21% | +14.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.88% | -2.03% |
Volatility
EOD vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is 4.46%, while Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that EOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EOD | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 5.06% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 13.69% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 15.98% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 16.77% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 18.56% | +0.50% |
EOD vs. AOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EOD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than AOD's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EOD vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison
EOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, less than AOD's 12.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 12.10% | 12.00% | 10.73% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 6.75% | 7.80% | 7.71% | 9.57% | 7.29% | 9.10% | 8.93% |
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund | 8.35% | 8.73% | 9.16% | 9.98% | 11.80% | 8.76% | 11.41% | 10.36% | 13.84% | 10.56% | 9.91% | 12.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EOD and AOD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOD has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to EOD (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOD dropped -57.02% vs AOD's -72.26%.
EOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EOD and AOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer