ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE
ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while XMLD.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENTR.DE returned 36.69% vs 72.24% for XMLD.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLD.DE.
Performance
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENTR.DE achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than XMLD.DE's 42.18% return.
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 22.77%
- 1Y
- 36.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 19.30%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 38.22%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.78% | 17.08% | -0.06% |
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 42.18% | 16.99% | 22.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENTR.DE and XMLD.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENTR.DE
XMLD.DE
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENTR.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 4.62 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 12.52 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENTR.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.76 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.82 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum XMLD.DE drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and XMLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENTR.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -42.81% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -15.80% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -2.30% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -13.51% | +7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 5.84% | -3.07% |
Volatility
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) is 4.62%, while L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that ENTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENTR.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 10.34% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 19.89% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 26.47% | -9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 27.22% | -12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 28.52% | -13.50% |
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMLD.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENTR.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENTR.DE nor XMLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENTR.DE and XMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMLD.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ENTR.DE is categorized as Commodities, while XMLD.DE is Technology Equities. ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.49% for XMLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for ENTR.DE and XMLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer