ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE
ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while XMLC.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Water. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENTR.DE returned 37.69% vs 6.86% for XMLC.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLC.DE.
Performance
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENTR.DE achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than XMLC.DE's 2.11% return.
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMLC.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.78% | 17.08% | -0.06% |
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 2.11% | 3.88% | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENTR.DE and XMLC.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024 | 0.12 |
The correlation between ENTR.DE and XMLC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENTR.DE
XMLC.DE
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENTR.DE | XMLC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 0.62 | +3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 1.60 | +11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENTR.DE | XMLC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 0.48 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.56 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum XMLC.DE drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and XMLC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENTR.DE | XMLC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -35.25% | +21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -11.02% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -7.57% | +4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -6.31% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 4.28% | -1.51% |
Volatility
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) at 4.03%. This indicates that ENTR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMLC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENTR.DE | XMLC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.03% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 10.79% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 14.11% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 15.51% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 18.66% | -3.64% |
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMLC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENTR.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENTR.DE nor XMLC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENTR.DE and XMLC.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMLC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMLC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ENTR.DE is categorized as Commodities, while XMLC.DE is Water Equities. ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.49% for XMLC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ENTR.DE and XMLC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer