ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and ESAE.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while ESAE.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Equal Weighted Ex Business Involvement Screens Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENTR.DE returned 32.51% vs 18.34% for ESAE.DE. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESAE.DE.

Performance

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENTR.DE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than ESAE.DE's 12.72% return.

ENTR.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 5.25%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 1Y: 32.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.67%

ESAE.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.45%
• 6M: 10.98%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	€1.51K	€12.50K	€11.56K
ESAE.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc	€30.33K	€23.68K	€29.24K

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	9.03%	22.86%
ESAE.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc	12.72%	7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ENTR.DE and ESAE.DE is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ENTR.DE

ENTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ENTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ENTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ENTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ENTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ESAE.DE

ESAE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 75
ESAE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ESAE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ESAE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ESAE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ESAE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENTR.DE	ESAE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.62	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.34	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	2.73	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	10.60	-1.20

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the ESAE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENTR.DE and ESAE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, which is greater than ESAE.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and ESAE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENTR.DE	ESAE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.89%	-6.70%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.72%	-6.70%	-3.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.83%	-0.68%	-5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-1.09%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	1.73%	+1.74%

Volatility

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE) at 2.72%. This indicates that ENTR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESAE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENTR.DE	ESAE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	2.72%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	7.76%	+4.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	11.31%	+6.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.27%	11.01%	+5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.27%	11.01%	+5.26%

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAE.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENTR.DE vs. ESAE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENTR.DE nor ESAE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENTR.DE and ESAE.DE in my portfolio?

ENTR.DE and ESAE.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENTR.DE or ESAE.DE?

On fees, ESAE.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENTR.DE or ESAE.DE?

ESAE.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.

What is the main difference between ENTR.DE and ESAE.DE?

ENTR.DE is categorized as Commodities, while ESAE.DE is Global Equities. ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while ESAE.DE tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Ex Business Involvement Screens Select Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.20% for ESAE.DE.