ENS vs. QS
ENS (EnerSys) and QS (QuantumScape Corporation) are both stocks. ENS operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while QS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, ENS returned 20.56%/yr vs -21.49%/yr for QS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENS vs. QS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENS achieves a 55.77% return, which is significantly higher than QS's -22.84% return.
ENS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 55.77%
- 6M
- 55.61%
- 1Y
- 174.64%
- 3Y*
- 30.88%
- 5Y*
- 20.56%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
QS
- 1D
- 16.52%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- -22.84%
- 6M
- -29.66%
- 1Y
- 83.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- -21.49%
- 10Y*
- —
ENS vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENS EnerSys | 55.77% | 60.28% | -7.57% | 37.90% | -5.64% | -4.04% | 9.22% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -22.84% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 757.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENS and QS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020 | 0.44 |
Fundamentals
ENS:
$8.69B
QS:
$4.91B
ENS:
$7.67
QS:
-$0.72
ENS:
4.56
QS:
4.43
ENS:
$3.75B
QS:
$0.00
ENS:
$1.10B
QS:
-$49.03M
ENS:
$426.46M
QS:
-$378.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENS vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank
ENS
QS
ENS vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EnerSys (ENS) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENS | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.22 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.59 | 1.24 | +8.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.35 | 1.89 | +32.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENS vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENS drawdown since its inception was -83.95%, smaller than the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENS and QS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENS | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.95% | -97.36% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.32% | -67.68% | +49.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.32% | -73.93% | +44.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.77% | -91.45% | +49.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -93.89% | +87.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -85.54% | +67.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 44.30% | -39.19% |
Volatility
ENS vs. QS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EnerSys (ENS) is 15.61%, while QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a volatility of 28.97%. This indicates that ENS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENS | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.61% | 28.97% | -13.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.91% | 50.24% | -18.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.97% | 104.27% | -67.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 86.11% | -51.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.69% | 105.96% | -69.27% |
Dividends
ENS vs. QS - Dividend Comparison
ENS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while QS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENS EnerSys | 0.46% | 0.68% | 1.01% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 0.89% | 0.84% | 0.94% | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.90% | 1.25% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ENS vs. QS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EnerSys and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ENS and QS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (28.97%) compared to ENS (15.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENS dropped -83.95% vs QS's -97.36%.
ENS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENS and QS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer