ENHNX vs. CEMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX).
ENHNX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Dec 14, 2015. CEMFX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHNX Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund | 4.27% | 6.20% | 6.89% | 0.99% | -1.98% | 21.67% | 1.52% | 18.16% | -5.10% | 10.69% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 7.09% | 31.39% | 9.51% | 26.45% | -16.15% | 6.74% | 8.70% | 19.75% | -16.90% | 29.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHNX achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ENHNX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 7.03%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
ENHNX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
CEMFX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 38.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENHNX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank
ENHNX
CEMFX
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENHNX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 2.37 | -1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 2.99 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.45 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 2.99 | -2.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 11.06 | -8.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENHNX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 2.37 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.75 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHNX and CEMFX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison
ENHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than CEMFX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHNX Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund | 5.90% | 4.38% | 5.99% | 6.22% | 3.82% | 7.77% | 5.86% | 5.69% | 6.45% | 6.82% | 7.67% | 0.00% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 2.03% | 1.72% | 3.31% | 4.68% | 1.26% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 4.16% | 2.26% | 3.59% | 3.65% | 4.60% |
Drawdowns
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHNX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, smaller than the maximum CEMFX drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHNX and CEMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHNX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.59% | -39.30% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -12.41% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.30% | -28.13% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.59% | -39.30% | +3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -12.16% | +7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -9.69% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.35% | +0.09% |
Volatility
ENHNX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) is 3.30%, while Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that ENHNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENHNX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 6.93% | -3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 12.36% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 16.39% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 14.09% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 14.92% | +0.56% |