PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENGW.L is traded in GBP, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENGW.L achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPY5.L's 10.71% return.


ENGW.L

1D
2.24%
1M
0.93%
YTD
31.48%
6M
29.41%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY5.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.58%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ENGW.L
SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
31.48%7.20%3.55%-2.06%20.65%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.71%9.06%27.55%20.31%-8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGW.L and SPY5.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.25

The correlation between ENGW.L and SPY5.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGW.L
ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENGW.LSPY5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

4.04

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

13.74

-2.95

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGW.L and SPY5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENGW.LSPY5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.45

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.01

-0.39

Drawdowns

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.65%, smaller than the maximum SPY5.L drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGW.L and SPY5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENGW.LSPY5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.65%

-25.97%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.56%

-7.19%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-21.10%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-0.29%

-6.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-3.27%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.12%

+2.26%

Volatility

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that ENGW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENGW.LSPY5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

3.49%

+4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

8.55%

+9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

11.90%

+9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

15.36%

+7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

16.47%

+6.33%

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENGW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENGW.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison

ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENGW.L
SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.71%2.20%2.29%1.64%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENGW.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

ENGW.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPY5.L is S&P 500. ENGW.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENGW.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENGW.L and SPY5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer