ENGW.L vs. INRG.L
ENGW.L (SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - ENGW.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while INRG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENGW.L returned 16.05%/yr vs 6.52%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENGW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRG.L.
Performance
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENGW.L is traded in GBP, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENGW.L achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 41.94% return.
ENGW.L
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 6M
- 29.41%
- 1Y
- 47.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRG.L
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- YTD
- 41.94%
- 6M
- 40.10%
- 1Y
- 86.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 31.48% | 7.20% | 3.55% | -2.06% | 20.65% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 41.94% | 34.75% | -24.39% | -23.83% | -1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENGW.L and INRG.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between ENGW.L and INRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ENGW.L
INRG.L
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENGW.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.55 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 6.96 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 20.85 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENGW.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 3.60 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.02 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.65%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -85.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGW.L and INRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENGW.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.65% | -85.09% | +63.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -12.38% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -44.29% | +22.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -25.86% | +18.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -56.55% | +47.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.14% | +0.24% |
Volatility
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) is 8.13%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that ENGW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENGW.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 9.35% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.03% | 17.61% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 23.97% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 24.78% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 25.33% | -2.53% |
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENGW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENGW.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison
ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.07% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.05% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.65% | 3.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENGW.L and INRG.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENGW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENGW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.
ENGW.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENGW.L and 0.65% for INRG.L.
Find the right allocation for ENGW.L and INRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer