PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENGH.TO vs. OTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Enghouse Systems Limited (ENGH.TO) and Open Text Corp (OTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENGH.TO is traded in CAD, while OTEX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OTEX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENGH.TO achieves a -9.85% return, which is significantly higher than OTEX's -25.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ENGH.TO has underperformed OTEX with an annualized return of -2.95%, while OTEX has yielded a comparatively higher 0.55% annualized return.


ENGH.TO

1D
-4.89%
1M
2.05%
YTD
-9.85%
6M
-9.00%
1Y
-29.70%
3Y*
-18.75%
5Y*
-17.00%
10Y*
-2.95%

OTEX

1D
-4.05%
1M
4.38%
YTD
-25.57%
6M
-28.13%
1Y
-12.25%
3Y*
-13.91%
5Y*
-8.39%
10Y*
0.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENGH.TO
Enghouse Systems Limited
-9.85%-21.09%-20.25%0.03%-24.14%-18.72%29.04%46.80%9.09%11.17%
OTEX
Open Text Corp
-25.57%13.78%-24.43%42.22%-31.32%5.32%3.10%30.72%0.77%9.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGH.TO and OTEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.30

Over the past year, ENGH.TO and OTEX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ENGH.TO:

CA$968.75M

OTEX:

$5.87B

EPS

ENGH.TO:

CA$1.26

OTEX:

$2.04

PE Ratio

ENGH.TO:

14.08

OTEX:

11.61

PS Ratio

ENGH.TO:

1.97

OTEX:

1.15

PB Ratio

ENGH.TO:

1.62

OTEX:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENGH.TO:

CA$494.98M

OTEX:

$5.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENGH.TO:

CA$266.89M

OTEX:

$3.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

ENGH.TO:

CA$122.92M

OTEX:

$1.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGH.TO
ENGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ENGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

OTEX
OTEX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
OTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enghouse Systems Limited (ENGH.TO) and Open Text Corp (OTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENGH.TOOTEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.97

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.26

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-0.48

-0.72

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the OTEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGH.TO and OTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENGH.TOOTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

-0.34

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

-0.29

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.02

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.32

-0.13

Drawdowns

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.35%, which is greater than OTEX's maximum drawdown of -52.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGH.TO and OTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENGH.TOOTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.35%

-52.93%

-24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.62%

-47.73%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.09%

-48.16%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.35%

-52.93%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.35%

-52.93%

-24.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.09%

-45.43%

-27.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.42%

-14.10%

-15.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.04%

25.64%

-0.60%

Volatility

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enghouse Systems Limited (ENGH.TO) is 8.99%, while Open Text Corp (OTEX) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that ENGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENGH.TOOTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

13.69%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

28.25%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.21%

35.75%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.97%

29.40%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.81%

26.90%

+4.91%

Dividends

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Dividend Comparison

ENGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than OTEX's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENGH.TO
Enghouse Systems Limited
6.83%5.70%3.69%2.41%1.99%4.37%0.84%0.87%1.05%1.01%0.97%0.62%
OTEX
Open Text Corp
4.59%3.30%3.62%2.35%3.13%1.78%1.59%1.53%1.80%1.43%1.44%1.61%

Financials

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enghouse Systems Limited and Open Text Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
120.10M
1.28B
(ENGH.TO) Total Revenue
(OTEX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ENGH.TO values in CAD, OTEX values in USD

ENGH.TO vs. OTEX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enghouse Systems Limited and Open Text Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
55.6%
73.1%
Portfolio components
ENGH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enghouse Systems Limited reported a gross profit of 66.79M and revenue of 120.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

OTEX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Open Text Corp reported a gross profit of 937.27M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.

ENGH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enghouse Systems Limited reported an operating income of 22.46M and revenue of 120.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

OTEX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Open Text Corp reported an operating income of 201.21M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.

ENGH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enghouse Systems Limited reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 120.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

OTEX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Open Text Corp reported a net income of 172.65M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ENGH.TO and OTEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENGH.TO and OTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer