ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Enghouse Systems Limited (ENGH.TO) and Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG.TO).
Performance
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGH.TO Enghouse Systems Limited | -16.91% | -21.09% | -20.25% | 0.03% | -24.14% | -18.72% | 29.04% | 46.80% | 9.09% | 11.17% |
CMG.TO Computer Modelling Group Ltd. | -17.81% | -50.14% | 6.96% | 78.08% | 42.23% | -9.06% | -37.97% | 42.99% | -33.42% | 9.79% |
Fundamentals
ENGH.TO:
CA$909.68M
CMG.TO:
CA$356.49M
ENGH.TO:
CA$1.26
CMG.TO:
CA$0.20
ENGH.TO:
13.23
CMG.TO:
21.07
ENGH.TO:
1.85
CMG.TO:
2.85
ENGH.TO:
1.52
CMG.TO:
4.08
ENGH.TO:
CA$494.98M
CMG.TO:
CA$126.20M
ENGH.TO:
CA$266.89M
CMG.TO:
CA$99.63M
ENGH.TO:
CA$122.92M
CMG.TO:
CA$35.06M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENGH.TO achieves a -16.91% return, which is significantly higher than CMG.TO's -17.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ENGH.TO has outperformed CMG.TO with an annualized return of -2.53%, while CMG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -4.71% annualized return.
ENGH.TO
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -17.99%
- 1Y
- -31.46%
- 3Y*
- -21.18%
- 5Y*
- -20.41%
- 10Y*
- -2.53%
CMG.TO
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- -17.81%
- 6M
- -31.44%
- 1Y
- -46.19%
- 3Y*
- -14.62%
- 5Y*
- -3.70%
- 10Y*
- -4.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ENGH.TO
CMG.TO
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enghouse Systems Limited (ENGH.TO) and Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENGH.TO | CMG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | -0.99 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | -1.27 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.80 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | -0.81 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.42 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENGH.TO | CMG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -0.99 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.62 | -0.09 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | -0.12 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.00 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENGH.TO and CMG.TO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Dividend Comparison
ENGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, more than CMG.TO's 1.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGH.TO Enghouse Systems Limited | 7.22% | 5.70% | 3.69% | 2.41% | 1.99% | 4.37% | 0.84% | 0.87% | 1.05% | 1.01% | 0.97% | 0.62% |
CMG.TO Computer Modelling Group Ltd. | 1.87% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 1.97% | 3.43% | 4.69% | 5.12% | 4.87% | 6.57% | 4.17% | 4.39% | 4.45% |
Drawdowns
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.35%, smaller than the maximum CMG.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGH.TO and CMG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENGH.TO | CMG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.35% | -100.00% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.82% | -56.54% | +15.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.35% | -74.24% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.35% | -74.24% | -3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.20% | -99.99% | +24.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -88.33% | +59.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.06% | 32.30% | -11.24% |
Volatility
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Enghouse Systems Limited (ENGH.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.33% compared to Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (CMG.TO) at 10.46%. This indicates that ENGH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENGH.TO | CMG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.33% | 10.46% | +6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.50% | 30.19% | -8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.78% | 46.58% | -17.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 40.77% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 38.55% | -6.76% |
Financials
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enghouse Systems Limited and Computer Modelling Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENGH.TO vs. CMG.TO - Profitability Comparison
ENGH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enghouse Systems Limited reported a gross profit of 66.79M and revenue of 120.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
CMG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Computer Modelling Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 26.71M and revenue of 32.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.
ENGH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enghouse Systems Limited reported an operating income of 22.46M and revenue of 120.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
CMG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Computer Modelling Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 7.22M and revenue of 32.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
ENGH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enghouse Systems Limited reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 120.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
CMG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Computer Modelling Group Ltd. reported a net income of 5.96M and revenue of 32.69M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.