ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L
ENGE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) and SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from State Street - ENGE.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENGE.L returned 17.62%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for SXLE.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENGE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLE.L.
Performance
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENGE.L is traded in GBP, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENGE.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than SXLE.L's 31.04% return.
ENGE.L
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 33.47%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- 58.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 31.04%
- 6M
- 28.53%
- 1Y
- 47.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.31%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 33.47% | 20.13% | -9.19% | 5.91% | 21.28% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 31.04% | 1.92% | 5.56% | -4.41% | 25.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENGE.L and SXLE.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ENGE.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
ENGE.L
SXLE.L
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENGE.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 2.86 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 8.85 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENGE.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.06 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.40 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum SXLE.L drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGE.L and SXLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENGE.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -62.09% | +36.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -16.65% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.54% | -23.84% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -9.06% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -15.52% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 5.38% | -1.37% |
Volatility
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) is 8.22%, while State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that ENGE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENGE.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 8.66% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 19.47% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 23.18% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 26.52% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 28.35% | -5.69% |
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENGE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENGE.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENGE.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENGE.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ENGE.L.
ENGE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ENGE.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.
Find the right allocation for ENGE.L and SXLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer