ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ENGE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) and PMLP.L (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from State Street and HANetf respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENGE.L returned 17.62%/yr vs 21.97%/yr for PMLP.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENGE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PMLP.L.

Performance

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ENGE.L is traded in GBP, while PMLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PMLP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENGE.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than PMLP.L's 25.60% return.

ENGE.L

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 33.47%
• 6M: 29.58%
• 1Y: 58.37%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PMLP.L

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 25.60%
• 6M: 23.75%
• 1Y: 28.09%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: 19.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	33.47%	20.13%	-9.19%	5.91%	21.28%
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	25.60%	-1.40%	35.81%	7.61%	6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGE.L and PMLP.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.58

The correlation between ENGE.L and PMLP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGE.L

ENGE.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ENGE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ENGE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ENGE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ENGE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

PMLP.L

PMLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
PMLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PMLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PMLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PMLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PMLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENGE.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	1.48	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.01	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	2.58	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.51	7.47	+7.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the PMLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGE.L and PMLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENGE.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	1.48	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.27	-0.55

Drawdowns

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than PMLP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGE.L and PMLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENGE.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-20.50%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-10.82%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.54%	-20.50%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.24%	-5.14%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-5.88%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	3.75%	+0.26%

Volatility

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) at 7.43%. This indicates that ENGE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENGE.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	7.43%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.02%	15.51%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.37%	18.86%	+3.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.66%	19.86%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.66%	21.34%	+1.32%

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENGE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PMLP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENGE.L vs. PMLP.L - Dividend Comparison

ENGE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PMLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.77%	3.31%	3.37%	6.48%	6.12%	6.57%	4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENGE.L and PMLP.L in my portfolio?

ENGE.L and PMLP.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENGE.L or PMLP.L?

On fees, ENGE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENGE.L or PMLP.L?

ENGE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PMLP.L.

What is the main difference between ENGE.L and PMLP.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ENGE.L and 0.40% for PMLP.L.