ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ENCO.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and RTWO.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ENCO.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped Total Return Index, while RTWO.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENCO.L returned 9.97%/yr vs 16.35%/yr for RTWO.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ENCO.L having a 20.05% return and RTWO.L slightly higher at 20.10%.

ENCO.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 15.07%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RTWO.L

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 14.38%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: 11.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ENCO.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	20.05%	8.38%	3.59%	-2.45%	23.37%	9.08%
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc	20.10%	11.33%	9.23%	20.05%	-18.68%	4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ENCO.L and RTWO.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.17

The correlation between ENCO.L and RTWO.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCO.L

ENCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ENCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ENCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

RTWO.L

RTWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
RTWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RTWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RTWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RTWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENCO.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.92	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.87	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	3.65	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	12.05	-5.65

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCO.L and RTWO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCO.L drawdown since its inception was -23.99%, smaller than the maximum RTWO.L drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCO.L and RTWO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENCO.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.99%	-53.86%	+29.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.95%	-9.08%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	-26.96%	+14.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.40%	-1.25%	-6.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.40%	-9.95%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	2.76%	+1.10%

Volatility

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ENCO.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENCO.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	4.39%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	12.94%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.35%	17.25%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	21.05%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	21.37%	-4.14%

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENCO.L and RTWO.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

ENCO.L vs. RTWO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENCO.L nor RTWO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENCO.L and RTWO.L in my portfolio?

ENCO.L and RTWO.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENCO.L or RTWO.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENCO.L or RTWO.L?

ENCO.L and RTWO.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

What is the main difference between ENCO.L and RTWO.L?

ENCO.L is categorized as Commodities, while RTWO.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. ENCO.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped Total Return Index, while RTWO.L tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index.